1445 Holy Dey 3rd in May

🇲🇦 my
Free National name:
I am, yahwoofkah ali el-bey
(UCC1-207/UCC1-308 UCC 1-103)
Hereditaments
33.759650 \  -117.010350
nr [775 conlon dr hemet 92545]
33.761170 \  -117.011240
nr [865 brisbane st hemet 92545]
33.761589 \  -117.011192
nr [hemet 92545]
#yahwoofkahiam
Banks Can't Own Property
CASE LAW
Official source for United States laws is the Statue at Large and the United States Code is
only prima facie evidence of such laws. Royer's Inc. v United States
Statue at Large are "Legal evidence" of laws contained therein and are accepted proof of
these laws in any court of the United States. Bear v United States (1985 DC Neb) 611
Unless Congress affirmatively enacts title of United States Code into law, title is only
prima facie evidence of law. Preston v Heckler (1984 CA9 Alaska) 734 F2d, 1359,
34CCH FPD34433, later proceeding (1984 DC Alaska) 596 F Supp 1158
Where title has not been enacted into positive law, title is only prima facie or rebuttable
evidence of law, and if construction is necessary, recourse may be had to original statue
National banking corporations are agencies or instruments of the general government.
designed to aid in the administration of a important branch of the public service, and are
an appropriate constitutional means to that end. Pollard v State, Ala 1880, 65 Ala 628
See, also, Tarrant v. Bessemer Nat Bank 1913, 61 So 47,7 Ala App 285
A national bank cannot lend its credit or become the guarantor of the obligation of
another unless it owns or has an interest in the obligation guaranteed especially where it
receives no benefits therefrom. Citizens' Nat Bank of Cameron v Good Roads Gravel
Co. Tex Civ App. 1921 236 SW 153 dismissed w.o.j
A national bank has no power to guarantee the performance of a contract made for the
sole benefit of another. First National Bank v Crespi & Co.Tex Civ App 1920 217 SW
705
National banks have no power to negotiate loans for others. Pollock v Lumberman's Nat
Bank of Portland Or 1917 168 P 616 86 Or 324
A national bank cannot act as a broker in lending its depositors' money to third persons.
Byron v First Nat Bank of Roseburg, Or 195 146 P 516 75 Or 296
A national bank is not authorized to act as a broker in loaning the money of others. Grow
v Cockrill, Ark. 1897, 39 S W 60, 63 Ark 418. See, also, Keyser v Hitz Dist of Col 1883
2 Mackey 513
Officers of a national bank in handling its funds are acting in a fiduciary capacity, and
cannot make loans and furnish money contrary to law or in such improvident manner as
to imperil its funds. First Nat Bank v Humphreys Okla 1917 168 P 410, 66 Okla 186
K
71
🇲🇦

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Saturn 1445 summer

exhibit 2. Doctrine of Discovery